Response to Paul Sutter: Is the universe a fractal? Yes it is!

By on

 In response to Paul Sutter's, Is the Universe a Fractal? Yes, it is.

His response is lazy and outdated. It is Clickbait.

I am not saying this because I just wanted to; I am because I've tested it; I've modelled the growth of a fractal, and the fractal is the best fit. I wonder if any other person has done that, modelled a geometry to the movements of the universe?  Put another way, if you model the growth of a fractal, which I have, the universe's evolution is precisely what you would expect to see. The distribution of galaxies is exactly what you expect to see. The large, smooth structure of the observable universe — the space that the sceptics of fractal cosmology point to as evidence of a breakdown in the theory — is, by my modelling, the trunk of a fractal structure. All fractals have this hierarchical structure. Take a look at a tree, and I have modelled tree growth too; the trunk is the majority of the area of a tree, and that trunk is the smooth outer universe that they are claiming to refuse fractal cosmology. And it is out there in that smooth outer universe where the large-scale structures are the large quasar groups; that's what I call the boughs of the fractal universe. And these structures are old, just what you would expect to see.

Moreover, by my model, you would expect to see Hubble expansion and, importantly, accelerated expansion. All fractals' growth accelerates with time. All plants or life are exponential. Plants are classic fractals. The universe is not like any other fractal. It is expanding away, surrounding us. And that CMB was once a seedling, to use the analogy.

So, Paul Sutter, you're wrong, and I challenge you to repeat my model.

And by the way, the fractal is an amazing geometry. I have found its key property, there are many, is duality. Not only does it explain the structure of the universe, but uncannily explains what is described as quantum. And I, too, have done that work and modelled it. 

I have worked on this for some 20 years and had two papers published in the International Journal of Quantum Foundations. They are not peer-reviewed, but the editor, the author of four books on quantum mechanics, thought they were interesting. They are the best I can do as an amateur.

International Journal of Quantum Foundations, Speculations. The Fractal Corresponds with Light and Foundational Quantum Problems https://ijqf.org/archives/6806). Experiment on Inverted Fractal Corresponds with Cosmological Observations and Conjectures
https://ijqf.org/archives/7011

By the fractal, I have written an interpretation of quantum mechanics, and I think I can explain the phenomenon. By the fractal, I have explained the life scale structure of the universe, continuing what was begun by the early fractal cosmologists. I have unified the two. 

Nobody has asked me any questions about my work.

Why don't you be the first Paul.

Else, in the words of Richard Dawkins, you are lazy.


Related posts. 

https://www.fractalnomics.com/2024/04/fractal-cosmology-david-hogg-letter.html

https://www.fractalnomics.com/2023/05/%20Fractal-Cosmology-Unifying-Theory-Submitted.html




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Natural fractal lake, Arethusa Pool, the worlds only?

By on
Image
Is Arethusa Pool (New Zealand) and its islands the world's only natural fractal lake? I was there with my family in January. It was a wonderful day and very exciting for me—mathematically speaking. Arethusa Pool (and its island) is on Mou Waho Island, Lake Wanaka, the South Island of New Zealand, and the South Pacific Ocean. Water (the South Pacific Ocean), land (South Island New Zealand), water (lake Wanaka), land (Mou Waho Island), water (Arethusa Pool), land (islands on Arethusa Pool); water in a puddle after rain (or when I filled it), land as small as a square centimetre inside the puddle, ..... water??   Arethusa Pool, and Lake Wanaka New Zealand 2015.   
Read more

Fractal Dimension, (Economic's) Elasticity and Complexity

By on
Image
Update May 2017 This is by far my best idea; I have written it up in a working paper at  my academia.edu  and  vixra , and named it:   Quantum Mechanics, Information and Knowledge, all Aspects of Fractal Geometry and Revealed in an Understanding of Marginal Economics. I shall post the Abstract, followed by the original post, followed by the paper. I hope to have someone collaborate and review my work in time. Abstract Fractal geometry is found universally and is said to be one of the best descriptions of our reality – from clouds and trees to market price behaviour. As a fractal structure emerges  – the repeating of a simple rule –  it appears to share direct properties familiar to classical economics, including production, consumption, and equilibrium. This paper was an investigation into whether the mathematical principles behind ‘the market’ – known as marginalism – is an aspect or manifestation of a fractal geometry or attractor. Total and margin...
Read more

ePublic Goods. Is the internet making new public goods?

By on
Image
Keywords: Public Goods, Internet, Media, Copyright, Market Failure, File Sharing, ePublic Goods An Explanation of the Mass Failure in the Market: the Internet – the Creator of ePublic Goods   First published: October 9, 2010 Abstract Media and entertainment industries are declining; profitability is down due to ‘freer computer access. Is the internet producing ‘Public goods’ from what were Private goods? With respect to these goods and the Internet, the assumption used to classify ‘Private goods' and Public goods in an economy (the degree of excludability and rivalry) was analysed, and the respective industries were tested for being Public Goods. It was concluded that these goods within the entertainment/media industries are slowly being repositioned from what is termed 'private' or 'club'/'congestion' goods to their extreme opposite, public goods. The ‘free rider problem’ of Public Goods has become the ‘free copy problem’ with respect to t...
Read more