FRACTAL ECONOMICS

I'm looking at my feeds, and I see astronomers have discovered (or finally recognised; we've known about them for years) that there is a 'large' structure at the outer edges of the universe. 3 billion years wide, 'Giant Arc'. https://www.sciencetimes.com/.../could-this-3-billion... This blows apart the standard model of cosmology as for it galaxy distribution is smooth on all scales. But a few have challenged this view and said the universe is fractal - fractal-cosmology. I came into this from the outside, indirectly. The universe is recognised 'by science' as being fractal on small scales (out to around 1 billion years), but on large scales, it is smooth and assumed not fractal. No, it is not smooth, and nor should it be. I have taken fractal cosmology further by modelling a fractal (doing the maths directly from a fractal, an experiment). Big structures like the Giant Arc are exactly what we would expect to see—like big branches on a tree near the trun...

The IR 'hairdryer paradox'. This is a thermogram of an operating hairdryer, taken using the same technology that enables us to understand greenhouse gases—thermoelectrics. Why is there a gap after the hairdryer outlet? Is the air not hot? Yes, it is blowing onto a surface, so it must be hot. Is the air not radiating infrared (heat)? Everything with a temperature radiates IR, but from this image, it appears 'air' (mostly nitrogen and oxygen) doesn't—hence, they are termed non-greenhouse gases. But this is wrong. It is that the instrument's thermo-transductive detector does not transduce electricity from the radiant heat of nitrogen and oxygen molecules. How did the 'air' get hot in the first place - and so quickly - if it does not absorb IR radiation? Air is an extremely poor thermal conductor of heat (0.026 W/(m K) ) and has a very low thermal diffusivity. Convection must imply radiation and/or conduction, so what is it? It has to be from radiation. Nitr...