Sunday, August 4, 2019

Air Radiation: Is the land heated first or is the air heated - by the sun

Radiation: does the sun - by radiation - first heat the earth and then warm the air - to disperse fog? Or, is it the air that is radiated first - as I have claimed?
This 'earth first' is the premise of GH theory (the non - GHGs don't absorb IR right?) and interestingly with meteorology theory with fog dispersion explanations. They both claim it is the land that is first heated and then the fog disperses.
In this clip, we see the fog disperse to the morning sun over a lake. Note there is little to no wind. I assume the lake temperature is likely to be constant over the time filmed.
I think the obvious solution is the air is warmed by radiation at its quantum IR absorption emission spectra. The air temperature rises, pressure changes, the water evapourates - blue sky.

Monday, December 10, 2018

The Greenhouse Gases and Infrared Radiation Misconceived by Thermoelectric Transducers

Hello everyone,

I have recently put out my second paper called  The Greenhouse Gases and Infrared Radiation Misconceived by Thermoelectric Transducers complementary to my earlier paper Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory. As the title(s) suggest - a spent a lot of time on those titles - the greenhouse gases are no more than the thermo-electric gases. What is more radiation theory is all based on thermoelectrics and I too have addressed this.
I have concluded all gases are 'greenhouse gases. They all absorb and emit IR radiation in accordance with quantum mechanics, it is just we need two instruments to measure them.

Read a summary article I put together: Settling The Climate Woo With Quantum-Based Raman Spectroscopy

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Is our skin colour evidence of Einstein's photoelectric effect and the (energy of the) UV photon?

I think I touched on something profound today in class: is our skin colour evidence of Einstein's Nobel Prize work, the photoelectric effect and the (energy of the) photon? What he established was 'light' photons increase in energy, in punch, as the frequency increases, and particularly after the ultra-violet (pardon the pun 'particularly' - he is the father of Quantum mechanics in the same work he he).
Before the UV frequency the energy of the visible light, the IR (heat), microwave, and radio - diminishing to being very weak. Our skin colour, from this work by Dr Nina Jablonski, is determined by our ancestral exposure, or not, to UV - it's UV that kills us, and we adapted/evolved colour to protect us.
You may ask why we were talking about this in econ? It was to do with health systems and merit goods - here's to them.

Saturday, October 13, 2018

Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory

I've gone back to the drawing board, noticing and frustrated I was not getting the attention I demand from what I have uncovered. I have split my paper into two, and it works; the first I share here, and the second - on how the GHGs are really only the thermoelectric gases and is flawed - I will work on now. 
N2 and O2 (the '99%' non-GHGs) have QM predicted spectra, and 2338 and 1556 cm-1 respectively and these are observed by Raman Spectroscopy, IR specroscopy's complement instrument. Do not mess with quantum mechanics! 
Raman laser spectroscopy (not to be confused with the Raman effect!) makes IR spectroscopy redundant: it measures very accurately the QM predicted positions and temperatures!! of N2 O2 CO2 CH4 H2O spectra and more. What is more, the N2- CO2 laser operates on the QM absorption of its one spectra mode. N2 absorbs IR and responds, else no facial surgery. And can you believe it, with this CO2 laser it is N2 that is the gases that 'heats' the CO2. I have found the CO2 laser works for IR photons too. Game set match! Why hasn't someone else seen this before me? This needs a working group to develop a paper to take this to the world; I can't take it any further, or write it better.

Quantum Mechanics and Raman Spectroscopy Refute Greenhouse Theory

Thursday, April 26, 2018

New Publication: Towards a Coherent Radiation Theory of the Atmosphere

Update: I rewrote so as to answer Alsups Question Number 2.
Response to Judge Alsup’s Question Number 2: “What's the molecular reason that CO2 is a greenhouse gas, unlike oxygen and nitrogen?” Augmenting 19th Century Thermoelectric Greenhouse Theory with 20th Century Quantum Mechanics Raman Spectroscopy: Towards a Coherent Radiation Theory of the Atmosphere.

I am currently rewriting this again, this time: Greenhouse theory contradicts quantum mechanics.


Hello, I just posted/published my theory of the atmosphere to my research platforms. Over the last 2 or so years (more like 10) I have reviewed the physics of greenhouse theory and concluded the special greenhouse gases, first discovered by J Tyndall in 1859, are really only the thermoelectric gases detected by thermoelectric transducers (thermopiles and the like, as Tyndall used) and the non-greenhouse gases oxygen and nitrogen are not thermoelectric but their quantum mechanics IR spectra are detected, and temperatures measured from them, by modern Raman Laser instruments - so they too are greenhouse gases. There are only greenhouse gases, no special ones; but it looks like nitrogen is the one that dominates by transferring its energy directly to CO2. Quantum and thermodynamic theory show all gases are equivalent with respect to radiation, and it is the instruments that are special. I also found practical application of the theory in the operation of CO2 Lasers as proof, where N2 is radiated and it heats the CO2 to lase temperatures. Now to get it reviewed from the top, from all sides: no one will like this . The strange thing is I have only put together what is already there and understood, it's just that no-one has done it.

Augmenting 19 th Century Thermoelectric Greenhouse Theory with 20 th Century Quantum Mechanics Raman Spectroscopy: Towards a Coherent Radiation Theory of the Atmosphere

I hope to present it an disseminate it over the next period, I hope it's the start of something big. Right now you can read it and please comment at if you see a problem or have a question.



Wednesday, December 27, 2017

Koch Snowflake Area paradox: it's infinite I say.

I don't agree the area of the Koch snowflake is finite as claimed. The calculation may give the result of finite number - from a fixed point - but as the system is iterating infinity, as is assumed, the area of each added triangle will be real, and these areas infinitely diminishing - asymptotically. 

If we were to zoom into the 'last' iteration area size where the area goes finite, I am sure we would 'see' iteration continuing and with this diminishing added area.

Infinite Series and convergence.
There seems to be a paradox here, a practical result conflicting with a calculated result. I think in reality it is both: these infinite series must go on (converging), presenting ever diminishing values, and thus the 'limit' must be irrational, not finite. But I am not going to challenge the finite calculation, I have not the authority or ability to do that. Interesting.

Tuesday, September 19, 2017

Presenting my work.

For the first time in 2 years I taught my beloved demand theory and drew the demand curve; the first time since I've written my fractal theory 'of everything'  . In the last 5- 10 minutes of the class I showed part of what I have discovered: a window into, and link between 'reality' and quantum world through a geometry. 
Funny thing is, they said they got it.