Monday, October 18, 2010

Fractal Dimension, (Economic's) Elasticity and Complexity

Update May 2017
This is by far my best idea; I have written it up in a working paper at my and vixra, and named it:  Quantum Mechanics, Information and Knowledge, all Aspects of Fractal Geometry and Revealed in an Understanding of Marginal Economics.
I shall post the Abstract, followed by the original post, followed by the paper. I hope to have some collaborate and review my work in time.
Fractal geometry is found universally and is said to be one of the best descriptions of our reality – from clouds and trees, to market price behaviour. As a fractal structure emerges – the repeating of a simple rule – it appears to share direct properties familiar to classical economics, including production, consumption, and equilibrium. This paper was an investigation into whether the mathematical principles behind ‘the market’ – known as marginalism – is an aspect or manifestation of a fractal geometry or attractor. Total and marginal areas (assumed to stand for utility) and the cost of production were graphed as the fractal grew and compared to a classical interpretation of diminishing marginal utility theory, and the market supply and demand. PED and PES was also calculated and analysed with respect to (iteration) time and decay.  It was found the fractal attractor demonstrates properties and best models classical economic theory and from this it was deduced the market is a fractal attractor phenomenon where all properties are inextricably linked. The fractal, at equilibrium, appears to be a convergent – zeta function – series, able to be described by Fourier analysis, and involves Pi, i, e, 0, and 1 (of Euler’s identity) in one model. It also demonstrated growth, development, evolution and Say’s Law – production before consumption. Insights from the fractal on knowledge and knowing are also revealed, with implications on the question of what exactly is ‘science’ – and what is ‘art’? A connect between reality and quantum mechanics was identified. It was concluded marginal, classical economics is an aspect of a fractal geometry.  
Marginal, Fractal, Elasticity, Utility, Cost, Production, Price, Growth and Development, Say’s Law

Original Post

Fractal Dimension and Elasticity - is there a connection?
I have found - after analysing the Koch Snowflake fractal with standard economic analysis - that there maybe a connection between Economics 'Elasticity coefficent' (which is a universal measure of the change in one variable to a change in another) - and the fractal dimension. That is to say, Price Elasticity of Demand (PED) is possibly the same as , or at least related to, the fractal dimension (D) - a measure of complexity. This may help explain the logarithmic nature of the demand curve.
Here's my reasoning:
Below you can also listen to a video blog of me on this topic too.

 Recap: Marginal Analysis of the fractal

In my last blog I established that the blue (MA) curve  in Fig. 1 -showing the change in area in the 'Koch Snowflake' after an other iteration- is mimicking or demonstrating something central to traditional marginal analysis and utility theory: that it maybe the origin of the consumer demand curve as we know it.   The next question begs - what's the MA's elasticity?

Koch Curve Elasticity
I calculated the elasticity using the following formula :
percentage change in Iteration divided by percentage change in Area
the results follow.

Results Table:


The reason I am so interested in Elasticity and Fractal Dimension is because of the occurrence of the -1.25, percentage change in area - that would traditionally be percentage change in Price.

When I first saw this -1.25 it didn't register, then I remembered seeing it before in the book  - The Colours of Infinity, Clear Books, pg 17 - where it showed that the fractal dimension of an island is around 1.25  - this is close (very close) to the fractal dimension of the Koch Curve  which is 1.2618.
As you can imagine I have a lot of questions surrounding this - 1.25:

Discussion and questions:

 It is very close to 1.2618, what does all this mean?
- does it mean..
  1. that elasticity is the same as, or closely related to, the fractal dimension?
  2. And if so, is elasticity a measure of complexity in a system: FD is after all what complexity you would expect to see with another iteration or scale - is this not PED too?
  3. That elastic goods are (relatively speaking) more complex than inelastic goods
  4. That the logarithm knowledge surrounding the method of calculation of PED and that of the demand curve has its origin with fractals and the fractal dimension?
General Observations:
The more I look at the world the more I am convinced that there is a connection between Fractal Dimension (FD) = E.
Food, and other primary products - and the countries that produce them are all said to be relatively low in elasticity. Conversely, technological goods - and the countries that produce them are said to be relatively  high in elasticity.
Ask yourself, are developing countries (primary producers) relatively speaking less complex compared to that of developed countries? Yes.

I believe that there is a connection.

UPDATE and breakthrough. I have a constant elasticity! 2010 11 28
Frustrated with my results, I recently began thinking about the quantity of triangles to explain growth. It dawned on me that I should be using the number of triangles added at each iteration for the calculation and not the iteration number as above.

Fig. 3b below shows the number of triangles added as the Koch Snowflake develops. Tables below this show the calculation of Elasticity of the Koch Snowflake.

The mid point non linear formula show a constant elasticity, and is very close to the fractal dimension of the Koch curve.
I feel like I am in business.  The Fractal Koch Snowflake elasticity fits with the Economic text book theory:  it is exponential and thus logarithmic. It fits that economies are fractals.
Update: 2012,01,03
Late last year I produced this entry (log and exponential analysis of koch snowflake). Please take a look if you are interested.

No comments:

Post a Comment