FRACTAL ECONOMICS

I quickly wrote this reply to a Facebook comment: " You guys really think he walked on the moon why and how do you know it’s true" My comment Purely by the complexity of the story. If it were fake, the complex story we know would have to have been scripted, top-down, like a movie script. The reality is that the story is infinite in complexity, right down to the people who stitched the suits, the boots, the chutes, and more. Full of stories by all of the hundreds of thousands involved. Every flight, hours and hours of specialist language, and the problems they had and overcame would all have had to be scripted. No one could do that. It was hard enough to script the 2-hour movie Apollo 13, the best of Hollywood in its time, and it wasn't really the real story compared to what is told by those there. It is my test, and it is the best. Reality is complex and fractal; fake is not.

Is our mind a fractal object or pattern collector, and if so, does the fractal explain laughter and sadness - as the object changes, its shape changes? This entry follows up on my earlier blogs on equilibrium, particularly the shape being set at or around iteration 7. Fractal development: Koch snowflake and equilibrium at iteration 7 Could this be how our minds recognise  –  and know  –  objects or shapes? If the universe is full of repeating patterns, then to know something, all we need is a collection of patterns; we don't need any detail at all. This can be demonstrated (below) by Koch snowflake development: as the snowflake develops, the 'stickman' develops; at some point  –  around 7 plus or minus 2 iterations  – the shape is known, and the stickman is defined. At iteration one, we know nothing. In the above diagram, we see the fractal development of a human figure. At iteration 1, ...

YouTube intro from the Author: Last Update 2010 -12-16 Here you see something I have been working with for the last 4 or 5 years, and I am feeling more and more happy with it. It's still in the rough, still in the draft, a work in progress -  but the idea should be clear. I am working on a wiki for everyone to get involved.  It is said: 'People in glass houses (greenhouses) shouldn’t throw stones'. T he breaking of the carbon climate spell - with today's telescope, the fractal. Before you begin reading this blog, can I suggest you ponder on this (fractal) thought experiment:  Imagine, if you will: You have a button you can push - on or off - that will set in place your beliefs so that they will be universal and observable at all scales and explain everything. In this case, your beliefs are that CO2 plays a dominant role in the greater atmosphere, with respect to temperature and is responsible for '...