Posts

Posts

Macdonalds Law Cosmic Increasing Acceleration with Time

Image
Cosmic Increasing Acceleration of Cosmological Constant or Dark Energy with Time Explained by the Fractal I think I may have discovered a law of nature. And in my own little room here .. with my cat, I'm calling it Macdonald's law. (m a c, small d). lol! In my fractal model of the universe, which I published a couple of years back , one of the predictions is that the acceleration rate will increase with time, the further we look out to its origins. This is an inextricable aspect of fractal growth.  Over the last month or so, I have been reading the new discoveries made by the modern telescopes, that they are observing changes in the accelerated rate of the universe, and that the 'dark energy', the 'cosmological constant', may change over time. That it was stronger in the past!  https://www.scientificamerican.com/.../why-evolving-dark.../ When I first read this, I interpreted it as working against my model, and I just swallowed it as something that I can't ex...

Communication check

 Hello readers,  I am writing this just to check if anybody can communicate with me through this blog. If you could kindly send me a thumbs up or whatever you like, it would be much appreciated. Maybe you can email me also at fractalnomics@gmail.com Thank you, Regards, Blair Macdonald.

My rejected Application to FQXi on Quantum 2016

  Tegmark FQXi BBC Quantum Fractal  I still haven't heard anyone ask any questions about my paper that I published in the International Journal of Quantum Foundations. I still think it's remarkable that someone like me got accepted to publish, not peer reviewed, not one paper, but two.  Two complementary papers, the first  on the quantum  and the fractal, and a second  on the fractal, the large-scale structure of the universe , and I'm not even a physicist.  And I haven't heard a word.  I wrote a comment on a YouTube clip recently that 'I feel unmeasured'. I understand that I could be seen as a crank, but the journal editor didn't think so. There's no way he would've let it go in if he thought that. He wrote to me that he thought my work was 'interesting'. Maybe they just needed my money. Joking. I'd like to share with you a little backstory of how I applied for a grant from the FQXI foundation on the topic of the observer. It was back in...

The Multiverse must be true.

 The Multiverse must be true.  Last night, while listening to an audiobook on physics and the topic of the Multiverse, I realized that the Multiverse may well be true. Up until this point, I had thought it was just absolute nonsense, a little bit woo-woo, something that is not useful, and, like they all say, out of the reach of the scientific method. But then it had me thinking, and very quickly, I came to the conclusion that why not? My thinking at the time went something like this: what if I were so isolated that all there was was me, what would I be thinking about my origins? I would have no information to know that my story is the story we know now, the human story, the life story, the story of life on Earth. So are we in that room when it comes to the universe, the Big Bang universe? Already, the universe is far older than I led to believe it is, and what if it is just a node, a branch on this? I pause to say it is an infinite tree. I'll stop there because it is a little...

The Drake equation should include the abundance of elements.

Image
 I just wrote this in a comment to the following clip. The Drake equation should include the abundance of elements. It is amazing to think we have them all, but do others?

Response to Paul Sutter: Is the universe a fractal? Yes it is!

 In response to Paul Sutter's,  Is the Universe a Fractal?  Yes, it is. His response is lazy and outdated. It is Clickbait. I am not saying this because I just wanted to; I am because I've tested it; I've modelled the growth of a fractal, and the fractal is the best fit. I wonder if any other person has done that, modelled a geometry to the movements of the universe?  Put another way, if you model the growth of a fractal, which I have, the universe's evolution is precisely what you would expect to see. The distribution of galaxies is exactly what you expect to see. The large, smooth structure of the observable universe — the space that the sceptics of fractal cosmology point to as evidence of a breakdown in the theory — is, by my modelling, the trunk of a fractal structure. All fractals have this hierarchical structure. Take a look at a tree, and I have modelled tree growth too; the trunk is the majority of the area of a tree, and that trunk is the smooth outer unive...

Age of Universe 8.8 Trillion Years Old CMB

New Age for Universe.  In an attempt to reconcile the problem of developed galaxies observed near the cosmic microwave background (CMB) limit of the observable universe, the author normalised the age of the universe by projecting local Hubble expansion redshift values out to correspond with the redshift value of the CMB. The new value places the universe's age at 8.8 trillion years old. The rationale for this recalculation was twofold: the large discrepancy between the redshift values at the CMB and near to it observed new galaxies, and that space expanding at the speed of light at this location and special relativity effects may distort observations. Normalisation of CMB Redshift with Local Hubble Redshift Values Increases the Age of the Universe to 8.8 Trillion Years