6. wikifractal.org
A momentous morning for me. Copernicus and Galileo were my inspirations, and after (this morning) uncovering and clearing some critical details, I’m now not afraid anymore – to speak, to show. Last month, I published on my blog two entries I had been working on for the previous 5 years: one on the fractal record of CO2 and the other on the fractal profile of CO2 (still in progress).
(http://www.fractalnomics.com/2013/03/the-fractal-record-of-heat-trapping-co2.html and http://www.fractalnomics.com/2013/04/fractal-profile-of-co2.html
).
This morning, I published a complementary
‘wiki website (www.wikifractal.org) to
these entries that will show and democratise ‘the where(?)’ (the examples of phenomena – at all scales) (or not!). Where does a phenomenon do as it is ‘said’
to do? Orbiting bodies and a sun-centred ‘universe’ is a good case: before the telescope and evidence, a world of dogma, and after, a world of ‘science’. With
the Hubble and (broken) Kepler telescopes, we now see orbiting bodies wherever
we look.
Wikifractal will reveal ‘the said’ CO2
properties (heat-trapping) and the instances of a heated relationship – do not
repeat anywhere; that the experiments and demonstrations used to prove CO2 is
a heat-trapping gas are wrong and makeup what is (using the words of Richard
Dawkins) the greatest magic show on Earth and of all time.
Wikifractal.org aims to reveal the (actual) shape – or fractal structure – of knowledge claims.
It is an instrument—as a compass is to navigation, a tuning fork to a musician—a truth detector.
Where Wikipedia.org deals with the what? and the how? (definitions and the like), Wikifractal.org deals with 'the where?' – the evidence and the examples (of 'the what'). The aim of Wikifractal.org is not necessarily to show proof of a knowledge claim but rather to show that there is no proof, shape, or repetition to the claim. It aims to falsify, to clarify claims for all to see, for all to get the picture. By allowing the public to log the repeating presence (or not) of a said claim and accumulating these logged cases at the claim's different scales, a (fractal) shape of knowledge of the claim will develop (or not). If not, the claim is false. If yes, when not expected, all will understand the claim. Wikifractal will show the 'claims' fractal record and its tree of occurrence – the ‘different’ occurrences of the 'same' knowledge claim.
The fractal record – like the fossil record that inspired its name – will help expose the shape of the claim, not through time (though it may) as in the fossil record, but through the present, the now.
As an example (insight)–
- (Scientific) phenomena have a fractal structure. They repeat—in the 'same' but ‘different’ way, at all (relevant) scales; order among the chaos.
- If something is not fractal - or it does not repeat - it is either surreal or a myth.
- Viewing an object phenomena (or claim) when it is in a state of ceteris paribus– a monotonic environment, absent of any other fractal objects – truth and thus knowledge can be determined from the shape. Still, the scale or size of that object (or claim) cannot be discerned.moon image
Comments
Post a Comment