### 1.8 Sustainability and the Fractal

**Sustainability and the fractal:**

**Update May 2017**

This is by far my best idea; I have written it up in a working paper at my academia.edu and vixra, and named it: Quantum Mechanics, Information and Knowledge, all Aspects of Fractal Geometry and Revealed in an Understanding of Marginal Economics.

I shall post the Abstract, followed by the original post. I hope to have some collaborate and review my work in time.

**Abstract**

Fractal geometry is found universally and is said to be one of the best descriptions of our reality – from clouds and trees, to market price behaviour. As a fractal structure emerges – the repeating of a simple rule – it appears to share direct properties familiar to classical economics, including production, consumption, and equilibrium. This paper was an investigation into whether the mathematical principles behind ‘the market’ – known as marginalism – is an aspect or manifestation of a fractal geometry or attractor. Total and marginal areas (assumed to stand for utility) and the cost of production were graphed as the fractal grew and compared to a classical interpretation of diminishing marginal utility theory, and the market supply and demand. PED and PES was also calculated and analysed with respect to (iteration) time and decay. It was found the fractal attractor demonstrates properties and best models classical economic theory and from this it was deduced the market is a fractal attractor phenomenon where all properties are inextricably linked. The fractal, at equilibrium, appears to be a convergent – zeta function – series, able to be described by Fourier analysis, and involves Pi,

*i, e*, 0, and 1 (of Euler’s identity) in one model. It also demonstrated growth, development, evolution and Say’s Law – production before consumption. Insights from the fractal on knowledge and knowing are also revealed, with implications on the question of what exactly is ‘science’ – and what is ‘art’? A connect between reality and quantum mechanics was identified. It was concluded marginal, classical economics is an aspect of a fractal geometry.**Keywords**

Marginal, Fractal, Elasticity, Utility, Cost, Production, Price, Growth and Development, Say’s Law

update: 2011-01-04

This entry follows on from my fractal growth and development entries - published earlier.

*There is never one snowflake alike, but there are snowflakes.*

The fractal offers insights and helps us understand growth and development, change and evolution, then it should also help us understand

**sustainability**. It should clarify what sustainability is. Is it real? Is it possible? Is it an illusion, or is it a delusion?

Fractals, by definition are patterns that show: 'same' but 'different', or regular irregularity - at all scales.

Fractals do support sustainability in one way; but not in another or the way 'we' currently associate sustainability with, the notion of keeping the environment or the economy today without compromising future generations. It maybe that the notion of sustainability is a (mathematically) non-sense. Here's why.

**Fractals and sustainability analysis**

To see why sustainability is a false statement - and doesn't hold - at least in the way it is commonly used - we need to split the above definition to the

**'same'**and the

**'different'**.

**'same'**

The 'same' or the 'regular' part of the fractal definition suggests that

**patterns, rules, and knowledge**all repeat, at all scales: this part is sustainable or constant, it will happen, it does happen. This feature of fractals is explained by

**found**

*strange attractors***in the study of chaos and fractals; the repeating of a rule.**

An example of the 'same' component - what I term

**lines of**

**fractility**- is exposed within the study of biology with '

**evolutionary convergence**' or

**'analogous structures' -**as shown in example diagram below. 'Same' pattern - a wing, but 'different' forms (Bat, Bird, and Insect). The line of fractility is clearly flight by wing, and this is a repeating pattern, repeating at all scales. Today, we could add to this (at least) the human developed aircraft wing .

repeating evolutionary patterns: same (function) but different (form) |

**'different'**

The 'different' or 'irregular' part of the definition alludes to change, roughness or variety, it alludes to evolution: this component part of the fractal definition is

**not a sustainable, or fixed notion.**This is where sustainability is a nonsense.

Fractals show us how there will never be a repeat of anything again: there isn't, or has never been, another snowflake the same; there will also never be another 'me', or another 'you'; there will never be another repeated moment. Things come and go, for a complexity of reasons.

As objects (species) evolve, so to will they become extinct, whether we like it, or not; but rules or functions the 'same') will not (not to suggest they can't, else I will be breaking the laws of fractility).

In the wing diagram example; we see that there are many different variates of wing, at least Bat, Bird and Insect; but there is more to this than just that: the 'different' suggests a superposition all the wings that have ever been, and will ever be. Patterns repeat, there will again be winged flight, it is a part of 'life'.

It is with this I suggest that the fractal shows us that the political notion of sustainability is a nonsense. The thought that humans, for whatever (moral) reason, can hold the likes of life, development, or an economy constant forever, when 'scientific' observation and knowledge shows us evidence only to the contrary, is a nonsense.

*As an after thought: it is as if this part of the definition (different) is a flow concept - the coming and going of something: the other 'same' or 'function' part maybe a stock, or standing (wave) concept.*

## Comments

## Post a Comment