fractal: A theory of mind, shape, objects knowing

Is our mind a fractal object or pattern collector, and if so, does the fractal explain laughter and sadness - as the object changes, its shape changes?


This entry follows up on my earlier blogs on equilibrium, particularly the shape being set at or around iteration 7.
Fractal development: Koch snowflake and equilibrium at iteration 7


Could this be how our minds recognise  –  and know  –  objects or shapes? If the universe is full of repeating patterns, then to know something, all we need is a collection of patterns; we don't need any detail at all. This can be demonstrated (below) by Koch snowflake development: as the snowflake develops, the 'stickman' develops; at some point  –  around 7 plus or minus 2 iterations  – the shape is known, and the stickman is defined. At iteration one, we know nothing.

In the above diagram, we see the fractal development of a human figure. At iteration 1, the shape is unknown; by iteration 5, we know it is a recognisable human shape—but nothing else.
The mind doesn't need to take in all the information we see—that is too costly. It only needs shapes or objects. To know more, we can 'zoom in' to get more detail.
More to come.

.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Natural fractal lake, Arethusa Pool, the worlds only?

Fractal Dimension, (Economic's) Elasticity and Complexity

ePublic Goods. Is the internet making new public goods?